For Patients: Has the cost of your medical cannabis been effected by the new CA regs?

For Providers: How are new CA reg effecting your ability to conduct business?

Thursday, September 24, 2015

California Medical Marijuana Bills Await Governor's Signature, Industry Considers Next Steps

Willie Brown watches Gov. Jerry Brown sign a bill in 2011.

The 2015 California legislative session ended with three medical marijuana regulatory bills being passed through both houses in the last 6 hours of the session.  New statewide medical cannabis rules are expected to be signed by the Governor anytime.  These rules establish licensing guidelines for all commercial medical cannabis activities including cultivation and manufacture of concentrates. 

These rules are not without flaws or criticism.  The amended bills were kept under tight wrap until just before they were voted upon near midnight on the final day of the session.  The senate and assembly suspended the rules that allow for public input ensuring no one could provide feedback in the 11th hour.  There is also still legal debate on just how much these bills tread on Proposition 215, the 1996 voter-approved initiative known as the Compassionate Use Act. 

However, the rules are better than expected given previous versions and the direction other states have taken.  For example, New York does not allow flowers and Washington does not allow patients to grow their own, issues perpetuating a black or gray market in those states. 

Previous versions of California’s bills put medical marijuana under the purview of the Alcohol Beverage Control Board, a move harshly criticized by patients.  Consumer Affairs, Agriculture and Public Health are the departments that oversee commercial cannabis operations in California, which is far more appropriate.

PAN has received many calls from patients and providers wanting to learn how to comply with the new rules or how their businesses may be affected.  Here are some things to consider:

Getting a state license is contingent upon local approval.  In order to apply for state licensing, a cannabis business must have local approval.  Bans are still a huge issue.  Medical cannabis operations in communities with a ban are not allowed to apply for a state license and are in jeopardy of legal action. 

Everything you knew about the AG Guidelines is wrong.  The news bills have dismantled the AG Guidelines and parts of SB 420 by allowing commercial retail of medical marijuana and phasing out closed-loop, not-for-profit collectives and cooperatives.   

There are also many compliance dates in the bills.  The rules seem to acknowledge that not all aspects of the law can be fully functioning or implemented all at once.  Compliance will fold in as licenses become available through the newly formed Bureau of Medical Marijuana Regulation, such as for independent laboratory testing. (For example, the rules seem to recognize cannabis can’t be tested per the law until these approved testing sites exist.)

Patients can still grow their own; 100 sq. ft of total grow space.  Caregivers can grow for up to 5 other patients, 100 sq. ft of grow space for each patient.  No licensing is required as long as all activity is non-commercial.

The California legislature acknowledges these rules are not complete and have stated they will start working on amendments January 2016.  Likewise, voter initiatives to end bans, protect medical, as well as legalize cannabis for adult use are in motion.  While a set of rules will be on the books soon, those rules will probably change sooner than later.

There are numerous other functions of these laws to consider.  Any one with questions or concerns can contact PAN directly.

AB 266 text

AB 243 text

SB 643 text


Additionally, proponents of the statewide voter initiatives are making final amendments.  The drafting of the Marijuana Control, Legalization and Revenue Act of 2016, has always been an open-source process.  All are welcome to participate.  You are encouraged to review the most recent draft of the initiative and provide any feedback.  The initiative will be filed for a final title and summary in two weeks. 

MCLR text

Feedback on MCLR can be sent to:

or feel free to contact PAN with any questions.

Friday, September 11, 2015

Governor Brown, Don’t Let This Go Down


As we start this post, just after midnight, with less that 24 hours before the 2015 California legislative session ends, the state has not yet posted updated versions of the three medical marijuana regulatory bills: AB 243, AB 266 and SB 643.   In the finals days of the session, referred to as ‘Floor Session Only,’ the legislature gutted all three of these bills and re-referred them back to committee, naked.  

The other factor at play is that the Senate and Assembly have suspended some key rules.  One set of rules that is suspended allows the legislature to amend bills without posting the bill or allowing public input/comment.  The other set of suspended rules allows the legislature to call committees and hear bills despite this period being the ‘floor session only,” without public knowledge or input on the committee level.   This is what we are referring to when we state that the process has moved behind closed doors.

In the last couple hours the media has begun to post that a deal has been struck and the bills will be voted on today.  However, no one has yet to see them and it is anticipated they look very different that they did before they were gutted.   The Governor and the California Legislature have bypassed the democratic process while claiming to the media that the process has been transparent and everyone is at the table.  Not true!

Take Action!

1.) **Contact Governor Brown.
Phone: (916) 445-2841
Fax: (916) 558-3160
facebook: https://www.facebook.com/jerrybrown
Twitter:  @JerryBrownGov

Let him know: Governor Brown, Don’t Let This Go Down
No 11th hour, backdoor deals.  The public has the right to know what’s in these bills AND be allowed to provide input, feedback, comments.  Don’t thwart the democratic process! 


2.) ** Contact the bills’ authors with the same message.
Assemblymember Rob Bonta
Phone: (916) 319-2018
Fax: (916) 319-2118
facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Assemblymember-Rob-Bonta-160502927367568/timeline/
Twitter: @RobBonta

Senator Mike McGuire
Phone: (916) 651-4002
Fax: (916) 651-4902
Email: senator.mcguire@sen.ca.gov (despite this being his listed email, messages are bouncing - try this - http://sd02.senate.ca.gov/contact/email)
facebook: https://www.facebook.com/SupervisorMikeMcGuire
Twitter:@ilike_mike


3.) **  Also send a copy of what you forward to the Governor and the authors, to YOUR California Representatives.
You have one assembly member and one state senator.  Most of their contact information is on their individual websites. 

4.) ** Forward this information to everyone and post to all your social media all day today.


“Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed, citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has.”  ― Margaret Mead


Concerns with previous versions of these bills:
*  Excessive taxes and fees - these regulations are to support the Compassionate Use Act not be a revenue stream for the state.  The CUA requires that medical cannabis be affordable. Some recent proposals would make medical cannabis so expensive the most vulnerable patients in the state would no longer be able to afford it - the people for whom Prop. 215 was originally intended. (The state will make money from legalization!)  But please, not off of the patients.

* Arbitrary dates that put one group of dispensaries in a different category that other just based on when they opened.  Many communities are still grappling with regulations and patients who have been working with their cities to operate legitimately should not be held to a different standard.

*  Special exemptions from accountability or transparency - previous versions of these bills would've allowed certain players to not have to acquire state certification and hence be exempt from any of those fees or accountability, clearly violating equal protection.

* Over-restrictive permitting - I have seen many regulatory attempts that are so cumbersome and expensive that it constitutes a de facto ban or supports a monopoly.

* No new criminal penalties!


#####

Wednesday, September 02, 2015

It's Complicated

Bill info at:  https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=201520160AB243

Bill info at: https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=201520160AB266

Bill info at:  https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=201520160SB643

The current status of the California state legislature's medical marijuana bills is complicated.  The 2015 session is ending in a few days and the legislature doesn't seem any closer to crafting a workable set of guidelines for authentic medical cannabis providers.

Just days ago Governor Brown weighed in on language and now all of that language is gone.  All of it.  PAN watched as each bill was updated with the entirety of each bill redlined.  The only language left is the intent of the original motion.  (The links with each image above will take you to the complete file on that bill.)

Also complicated is each bill now mentions the other..."This measure shall become operative only if.." the other bills become operative.  Click on the Today's Law As Amended tabs to see how the legislature has made this very confusing.

We are unsure if these bills have become placeholders for the next session or if amended language will fill these empty bills in the 11th hour before a final vote this session.  The Legislature has suspended the rules that require them to give notice to or take comment from the public - Joint Rule 62(a).  Providing any input at this point is almost impossible.

In years past when the legislature has done this, it has meant the death of that bill.  However, in years past the bills were not completely gutted prior to a full vote, nor did they have the Governor's attention while still on the floor.  We do not understand this strategy but we intent to ask many questions in the next few hours to find out.

While PAN supports equitable guidelines and regulations for medical cannabis operations, these bills  are egregious (favoring collectives with high-paid lobbyists) and expensive (lots of new fees and taxes), hence violating Prop. 215.  The Legislature is treating medical cannabis like adult social marijuana, effectively taking the Compassion out of the Compassionate Use Act and making it the Use Act For Cash.

PAN isn't going to stand for that.